A human living in a society in which
all or most food is acquired by foraging
in contrast to agricultural societies, which rely particularly on domesticated
species is known as a hunter-gatherer. Hunting-gathering
was humanity’s 1st and the most effective adaptation, conquering at
least ninety percent of the human history. Only a few contemporary societies are categorized as hunter-gatherers, and several supplement their foraging activity
with the keeping animals and
horticulture. In the early 1980s, a small on the other hand vocal part of the
archaeologists and anthropologists attempted to determine that contemporary
groups typically identified as hunter-gatherers. The purpose of this
essay is to describe the ways that one acquires social prestige and privilege
in a horticultural society.
Body
The history of the Simple
Egalitarian Horticultural societies is pretty long that dates back to approximately
12000 years ago in the Middle East, which was categorized by the utilization of
simple tools like as hoes in the domesticating
plants like vegetables as means of livelihood. I would like to say that this
period of the egalitarian Horticultural societies was a time before the
improvement of the agriculture in using animal and plows traction to do farming
and horticulturalists utilized to grow extra food and traded some of them that prepared
their quantity to be more than the
pastoralists (McLeod, 2012) .
It is clear that the Egalitarian
Horticultural societies utilized to endure without the centralized organ of
political, economic power or simply prevailing in hereditary status structures.
It is also clear that the egalitarian societies were familiar of various
prestige, privilege, and statuses that
individual enjoyed freely. There are numerous ways that individually acquired social privilege and prestige in the
egalitarian horticultural societies. Individual who occupied high social status
were categorized by the more enjoyed and privileges of many prestige as
compared to their complements in the lower statuses. On the other hand, there were
particular ways that one acquired social privilege and prestige as an
outcome of social ranks in the egalitarian settings.
Privilege and prestige shared many
relationships with the rank attainment in the horticultural societies. On the
other hand the absence of organized political power on the subject of the stratified
inherited ranks or social system, peoples shared relative equality. However
social or leadership differences still occurred even though it, not that recognized. Assuming a particular
leadership position in the horticultural society all over the personal achievement
may be through the rearing of animals,
advanced farming and utilization of enhanced farming tools were what deliberated social rank to the
individual in the society. So, there is a big relationship exists between the
distribution system and the status/ranking system (O. William Farley, 2011) .
Conclusion
In
conclusion, I would like to say that the history of the Simple
Egalitarian Horticultural societies is pretty long in the Middle East. Privilege
and prestige shared many relationships with the rank attainment in the
horticultural societies. The distribution of goods in a typical horticultural
society played a significant role and
horticulturalists utilized to grow extra food and traded some of them that
prepared their quantity to be more than
the pastoralists.
References
McLeod, J. D. (2012). Social Stratification and
Inequality. Springer Netherlands.
O. William Farley, L. L. (2011). Introduction to Social
Work (12th Edition). Pearson; 12 edition (July 9, 2011).
No comments:
Post a Comment